Showing posts with label shok-1. Show all posts
Showing posts with label shok-1. Show all posts

Wednesday, 20 July 2011

SHOK 1 – CENSORED IN CHINA

SHOK 1 – CENSORED IN CHINA

Having blazed a searing trail in China for the last few years, Shok 1 was invited back this month to be presented with a suitably sized slice of blank wall and asked by the authorities and an architectural firm alike to pour his energy and imagination into it. Whatever our preconceptions of Chinese attitudes to free expression, nothing in his previous experience of painting in China had prepared him for the brewing storm of all powerful mediocrity that was about to engulf his latest work. As the final precision touches were applied, the word dropped down from the labyrinthine corridors of bureaucratic control  - the work was unacceptable to official sensibilities and would be destroyed within days.

Now the obvious reaction would be – well look – it’s red and there’s a bloody metal noose on it – this is China after all – what did he expect?

And that would be to entirely miss the point – apart from the fact that he’s been painting metal nooses for a decade, and the symbolism of red in China goes way beyond any recent relationship with communism, if you want a pliable artist to produce ‘nice’ work for the local dignitaries to stand in front of and congratulate themselves on their cultural munificence – ya don’t fucking get a purist like Shok in to do it.

Equally though – Shok’s far too long in the tooth and way too complex an artist to clodhop down the courting controversy for its own sake road – the themes and symbolism of the picture themselves are entirely irrelevant to the principle in play here. You get an artist over who you have done some level of research on before setting the process in motion, hand him a giant wall and assure him of his creative freedom, then the second he’s finished – blithely inform him of its imminent destruction. Speaking of themes and symbolism – heart shaped noose anyone - talk about the painting prophesising and keeping up a running commentary on it’s fate.

It’s unacceptable to hide behind the – ‘This is China – obviously gonna censor it innit’ argument. Art simply cannot be stuffed kicking and screaming into whatever design a power structure may want it to fit – what was the logic here – let’s get an uncompromising artist to paint in our country cos that’ll show how open we are – oh shit he’s not compromising – better strip it away before anyone notices.’

Censorship is censorship – thanks to the camera being potentially mightier than the censor’s pen in today’s world – the photos are out – and by helping circulate the photos and getting the imagery and the story behind it out – we can help dissolve the power of censorship away make a mockery of this clumsy bid for suppression. A week ago – this painting – no matter how you read it was evidence of how far China has come – today – it’s evidence of how far China hasn’t come and the imagery itself has taken on an altogether darker significance.

We have huge respect for Shok here at LSD – please read our detailed and in depth interview with him in Issue 7




Monday, 6 June 2011

LSD Magazine Interviews Old Skool Graffiti Writer Shok 1



Piercing the pineal eye of shadowy midnight and hacking the arcane circuitry of unsettling consciousness growls the Shok. Carving through layers of slow burning, viceral imagination and illuminating the subliminal, the sublime and vivid flashes of the just plain slime, his ruthless, gleaming precision etches a molten mind-scape of dazzlingly elusive, nano warped lucidity onto the physical and the metaphysical alike. Liquid dreams and biting themes whistle through the looking glass and diamond drill impossibly clean vectors into the vortex as hypnotic visual detonations somehow manage to whisper an unstable silence back through the mirror of the mind...


How long after you started painting did you actually start to express yourself artistically? 

Hmm tricky question. I got involved in Writing in 1984 but I have been making art my whole life. I suppose I found my own voice in the early 90s?





At what point do the budgets, security and long time frames of legal art open up fresh dimensions and at what point do they sacrifice an intangible element? 

Each has it’s pros and cons. It’s healthy to be able to adapt to different situations as an artist I think. The movement I grew up in was always about getting the art out anywhere and everywhere. Invading spaces, taking over contexts. Getting up. The pioneers found new ways to place art in fresh contexts and I try to keep that spirit in what I do with my work now. I’ve become quite contemplative about my work of late and it’s slowed me down a bit which annoys me. So I’ve been deliberately making some work in places where it is going to be destroyed soon after.




Does the transience of illegal art imbue it with an intrinsic power? 

Illegality seems to lend it an alluring image in general. But I don’t give a shit about image. Ephemerality ... we are transient beings so perhaps it is a more realistic way to do art. (fleeting image of tags laid out on pavement in flowers a la Andy Goldsworthy). Ideas can endure anyway, and documenting the work photographically has always been a part of it. Infinitely better to see in it in real life too of course, and that’s a nice prize in this age of mass reproduction. As I’ve gotten older, I’ve found myself wanting to make things that last longer. I seek out spaces where the work can endure so a lot of people can see it. I tend to prefer putting more effort into each work rather than doing loads of quick things so I have to try to create spaces that suit that.


Is there any such thing as high art? 

I believe in it as an ideal to strive for, yes. I think it comes out of the everyday decisions and struggles, the sacrifices. 

Is imagination always one step ahead of the means to express it? 

I’m blessed/cursed with very clear visualisation. What I can look at in my head often isn’t what I’m able to paint at a given time for one reason or another. And there is always way too much of it. It’s a fucking torment.





Is commercialism a far more potent weapon than repression? 

It’s the most refined form of repression

Do all underground movements inevitably self corrupt? 

I don’t know, do they? There will always be both sellouts and people with integrity within a scene. I’m more about individuals than movements anyway. I’ve never liked rules. 

 
Is rebellion a starting point or an end in itself? 

For me it was a starting point. You can turn it into a tool and put to good use. I think illegal art is a good foundation ... I think it’s important to learn how to be strong in the world, how to create a space for your work, to be prepared to stand alone.





READ SHOK-1 FULL INTERVIEW FREE IN LSD MAGAZINE ISSUE 7